1st Stage: firm's profit maximization problem:
Choose: < output >
In order to maximize: < profits >
2nd Stage: firm's cost minimization problem:
Choose: < inputs >
In order to minimize: < cost >
Subject to: < producing the optimal output >

Choose: < inputs: l,k>
In order to maximize: < total cost: wl+rk >
Subject to: < producing the optimal output: q∗=f(l,k) >

Our tools for firm's input choices:
Choice: combination of inputs (l,k)
Production function/isoquants: firm's technological constraints

choose a combination of l and k to minimize total cost that produces the optimal amount of output

minl,kwl+rk


Graphical solution: Lowest isocost line tangent to desired isoquant (A)
B produces same output as A, but higher cost
C is same cost as A, but produces less than desired output
D produces is cheaper, but produces less than desired output

Isoquant curve slope=Isocost line slope

Isoquant curve slope=Isocost line slopeMRTSl,k=wrMPlMPk=wr0.5=0.5
Marginal benefit = Marginal cost
No other combination of (l,k) exists at current prices & output that could produce q⋆ at lower cost!

MPlMPk=wr

MPlMPk=wr
MPlw=MPkr

MPlw=MPkr=⋯=MPnpn
Equimarginal Rule: the cost of production is minimized where the marginal product per dollar spent is equalized across all n possible inputs
Firm will always choose an option that gives higher marginal product (e.g. if MPl>MPk)
Any optimum in economics: no better alternatives exist under current constraints
No possible change in your inputs to produce q∗ that would lower cost

Example:
Your firm can use labor l and capital k to produce output according to the production function: q=2lk
The marginal products are:
MPl=2kMPk=2l
You want to produce 100 units, the price of labor is $10, and the price of capital is $5.

The returns to scale of production: change in output when all inputs are increased at the same rate (scale)
Constant returns to scale: output increases at same proportionate rate to inputs change

The returns to scale of production: change in output when all inputs are increased at the same rate (scale)
Constant returns to scale: output increases at same proportionate rate to inputs change
Increasing returns to scale: output increases more than proportionately to inputs change

The returns to scale of production: change in output when all inputs are increased at the same rate (scale)
Constant returns to scale: output increases at same proportionate rate to inputs change
Increasing returns to scale: output increases more than proportionately to inputs change
Decreasing returns to scale: output increases less than proportionately to inputs change

Example: Does each of the following production functions exhibit constant returns to scale, increasing returns to scale, or decreasing returns to scale?
q=4l+2k
q=2lk
q=2l0.3k0.3
One reason Cobb-Douglas functions are great: easy to determine returns to scale:
q=Akαlβ
α+β=1: constant returns to scale
α+β<1: decreasing returns to scale
Note this trick only works for Cobb-Douglas functions!

In the constant returns to scale case (most common), Cobb-Douglas is often written as:
q=Akαl1−α
α is the output elasticity of capital
1−α is the output elasticity of labor


Goolsbee et. al (2011: 246)
Output Expansion Path: curve illustrating the changes in the optimal mix of inputs and the total cost to produce an increasing amount of output
Total Cost curve: curve showing the total cost of producing different amounts of output (next class)
See next class' notes page to see how we go from our least-cost combinations over a range of outputs to derive a total cost function
1st Stage: firm's profit maximization problem:
Choose: < output >
In order to maximize: < profits >
2nd Stage: firm's cost minimization problem:
Choose: < inputs >
In order to minimize: < cost >
Subject to: < producing the optimal output >

Keyboard shortcuts
| ↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
| ↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
| Home | Go to first slide |
| End | Go to last slide |
| Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
| b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
| c | Clone slideshow |
| p | Toggle presenter mode |
| t | Restart the presentation timer |
| ?, h | Toggle this help |
| o | Tile View: Overview of Slides |
| Esc | Back to slideshow |
1st Stage: firm's profit maximization problem:
Choose: < output >
In order to maximize: < profits >
2nd Stage: firm's cost minimization problem:
Choose: < inputs >
In order to minimize: < cost >
Subject to: < producing the optimal output >

Choose: < inputs: l,k>
In order to maximize: < total cost: wl+rk >
Subject to: < producing the optimal output: q∗=f(l,k) >

Our tools for firm's input choices:
Choice: combination of inputs (l,k)
Production function/isoquants: firm's technological constraints

choose a combination of l and k to minimize total cost that produces the optimal amount of output

minl,kwl+rk s.t.q∗=f(l,k)


Graphical solution: Lowest isocost line tangent to desired isoquant (A)
B produces same output as A, but higher cost
C is same cost as A, but produces less than desired output
D produces is cheaper, but produces less than desired output

Isoquant curve slope=Isocost line slope

Isoquant curve slope=Isocost line slopeMRTSl,k=wrMPlMPk=wr0.5=0.5
Marginal benefit = Marginal cost
No other combination of (l,k) exists at current prices & output that could produce q⋆ at lower cost!

MPlMPk=wr

MPlMPk=wr
MPlw=MPkr

MPlw=MPkr=⋯=MPnpn
Equimarginal Rule: the cost of production is minimized where the marginal product per dollar spent is equalized across all n possible inputs
Firm will always choose an option that gives higher marginal product (e.g. if MPl>MPk)
Any optimum in economics: no better alternatives exist under current constraints
No possible change in your inputs to produce q∗ that would lower cost

Example:
Your firm can use labor l and capital k to produce output according to the production function: q=2lk
The marginal products are:
MPl=2kMPk=2l
You want to produce 100 units, the price of labor is $10, and the price of capital is $5.

The returns to scale of production: change in output when all inputs are increased at the same rate (scale)
Constant returns to scale: output increases at same proportionate rate to inputs change

The returns to scale of production: change in output when all inputs are increased at the same rate (scale)
Constant returns to scale: output increases at same proportionate rate to inputs change
Increasing returns to scale: output increases more than proportionately to inputs change

The returns to scale of production: change in output when all inputs are increased at the same rate (scale)
Constant returns to scale: output increases at same proportionate rate to inputs change
Increasing returns to scale: output increases more than proportionately to inputs change
Decreasing returns to scale: output increases less than proportionately to inputs change

Example: Does each of the following production functions exhibit constant returns to scale, increasing returns to scale, or decreasing returns to scale?
q=4l+2k
q=2lk
q=2l0.3k0.3
One reason Cobb-Douglas functions are great: easy to determine returns to scale:
q=Akαlβ
α+β=1: constant returns to scale
α+β<1: decreasing returns to scale
Note this trick only works for Cobb-Douglas functions!

In the constant returns to scale case (most common), Cobb-Douglas is often written as:
q=Akαl1−α
α is the output elasticity of capital
1−α is the output elasticity of labor


Goolsbee et. al (2011: 246)
Output Expansion Path: curve illustrating the changes in the optimal mix of inputs and the total cost to produce an increasing amount of output
Total Cost curve: curve showing the total cost of producing different amounts of output (next class)
See next class' notes page to see how we go from our least-cost combinations over a range of outputs to derive a total cost function